Type
Classifications
Use the Erlanger Type Classifications
to Buy, Hold, Sell, and Sell Short Stocks!
|
Type 1 = Buy
|
|
Type 2 = Hold
|
|
Type 3 = Sell
|
|
Type 4 = Sell Short
|
Just what are the Erlanger Type
Classifications? They are extra rankings designed to pinpoint four patterns:
Type 1: Short Squeezes. We
like to buy these. These are stocks whose relative strength is so strong that
their Erlanger Technical Rank is above 70. This is not all, however. In
addition to relative strength, in order to qualify as a short squeeze, there
must be a lot of short selling. So a Type 1 short squeeze must have an Erlanger
Short Rank above 50. The following chart shows CPN with its Technical and Short
Ranks, its Short Interest Ratio, and a color study showing GREEN when
the numbers indicated a Type 1 "Short Squeeze" was underway:
![[Chart:1]](http://www.erlangersqueezeplay.com/esp/images/typeclass1.gif)
Type 2: Recognized Strength. We
like to hold these. These are stocks whose relative strength is strong but the
short selling is light. In other words, the trend of strength is recognized and
most expect it to continue, so the prevailing sentiment is to not sell short.
While we hold these issues, we also view them as higher risk precisely because
the strength is recognized -- the buying has largely already taken place.
Moreover, Type 2s often turn into Type 4s at some point, so a strategy of
getting ready to sell is appropriate, waiting for signs of relative weakness to
trigger the sell. A Type 2 pattern of recognized strength must have an Erlanger
Short Rank below 30. The following chart shows INTC with it's Technical and
Short Ranks, it's Short Interest Ratio, and a color study showing BLUE
when the numbers indicated a Type 2 "Recognized Strength" pattern:
![[Chart:2]](http://www.erlangersqueezeplay.com/esp/images/typeclass2.gif)
Type 3: Shorts Are Right. We
like to avoid these. These are stocks whose relative strength is weak but the
short selling is heavy. In other words, the trend of weakness is recognized and
most expect declining prices to continue, so the shorts are correct. While we
avoid these issues, we also view them as a potential precursor to a turnaround
-- the selling has largely already taken place. Type 3s often turn into Type 1s
at some point, so a strategy of observance is appropriate, waiting for signs of
relative strength to trigger a buy. However, if a stock goes from a Type 3 to a
Type 4, it is in real trouble -- this means the stock was unable to rise even
after the shorts covered (closed out their short positions by buying back the
shares they sold short). In other words, the shorts took their profits --
usually too soon. A Type 3 pattern must have an Erlanger Short Rank above 50.
The following chart shows AMZN with it's Technical and Short Ranks, it's Short
Interest Ratio, and a color study showing YELLOW when the numbers
indicated a Type 3 "Shorts Are Right" pattern:
![[Chart:3]](http://www.erlangersqueezeplay.com/esp/images/typeclass3.gif)
Type 4: Long Squeezes. We
like to sell short these. These are stocks whose relative strength is so weak
that their Erlanger Technical Rank is below 30. This is not all, however. In
addition to a lack of relative strength, in order to qualify as a long squeeze,
there must be very little short selling. We interpret this as a sign of
extremely bullish expectations. So a Type 4 long squeeze must have an Erlanger
Short Rank below 30. The following chart shows MSFT with its Technical and
Short Ranks, its Short Interest Ratio, and a color study showing RED
when the numbers indicated a Type 4 "Long Squeeze" was underway:
![[Chart:4]](http://www.erlangersqueezeplay.com/esp/images/typeclass4.gif)